Friday, March 13, 2026
Minneapolis.news

Latest news from Minneapolis

Story of the Day

White House blames Walz and Frey after anti-ICE protest disrupts Twin Cities church service

AuthorEditorial Team
Published
January 19, 2026/12:18 PM
Section
Politics
White House blames Walz and Frey after anti-ICE protest disrupts Twin Cities church service
Source: Wikimedia Commons / Author: Fibonacci Blue

Federal officials cite public-safety concerns as Minnesota leaders defend protest rights amid enforcement surge

A confrontation over immigration enforcement escalated into a political dispute after protesters disrupted a Sunday worship service at Cities Church in St. Paul, prompting federal officials to announce a civil-rights review and the White House to accuse Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey of encouraging unrest.

The disruption occurred on Sunday, Jan. 18, 2026, during a livestreamed service. Video of the incident shows a group entering the sanctuary and chanting slogans including “ICE out” and “Justice for Renee Good,” before the service ended early. Protesters said they were targeting David Easterwood, identified by the church as a pastor and described in federal court filings as the acting head of the St. Paul field office for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

The protest followed weeks of heightened tension in the Twin Cities after a surge in federal immigration activity and the fatal shooting of Renee Good, a 37-year-old mother of three, during an encounter involving an ICE agent earlier this month. Federal officials have said the shooting was self-defense, while community advocates have characterized it as unjustified.

DOJ review centers on protections for religious worship

On Jan. 18, the U.S. Department of Justice said it was reviewing whether the church disruption involved violations of federal civil-rights protections related to religious worship and intimidation. The department’s public statements framed the incident as interference with protected religious activity and signaled that potential violations would be pursued under federal law.

Organizers and participants rejected the premise of the federal response, arguing the protest was aimed at the role they attribute to Easterwood in immigration operations and that public focus should remain on alleged misconduct in enforcement actions. Cities Church did not issue a public statement immediately after the incident, and it remained unclear from the livestream whether Easterwood was present during the disruption.

White House claims local leaders fueled disorder; officials push back

On Monday, Jan. 19, 2026, White House messaging tied the church disruption to broader demonstrations in Minneapolis and asserted that Walz and Frey helped create conditions for disorder. No evidence was presented publicly that either official directed or coordinated the church protest.

In recent days, Frey has criticized the scale and tactics of federal immigration enforcement in Minneapolis, saying residents feel targeted and emphasizing that the city supports peaceful protest. Walz has also addressed public-safety concerns related to unrest, while state and local leaders continue to dispute how far federal authority can go in local jurisdictions.

Key facts in the dispute

  • The church disruption occurred Jan. 18, 2026, at Cities Church in St. Paul during a worship service livestream.
  • Protesters focused on Pastor David Easterwood, whose personal identifiers have been reported to match a federal filing naming an acting ICE field office director in St. Paul.
  • Federal officials announced a civil-rights review tied to protections for worship and potential intimidation.
  • The incident unfolded amid heightened tension after the fatal shooting of Renee Good during an ICE-related encounter earlier this month.

The unfolding response is testing the boundary between protected protest activity and legal protections surrounding religious worship, while sharpening political conflict over federal immigration tactics in Minnesota.

As investigations and political statements continue, the central unresolved questions remain whether any laws were violated inside the church and how officials at different levels of government will calibrate enforcement, protest policing and public messaging in a rapidly intensifying local environment.